Recombinant erythropoietin in autoimmune hemolytic anemia with inadequate bone marrow response: a prospective analysis.

ABSTRACT: Up to 30% of patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) show inadequate bone marrow (BM) compensatory response with inappropriately low levels of reticulocytes and endogenous erythropoietin. Ineffective BM compensation is associated with more severe anemia, transfusion need, and hospital admission, and treatment with recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) may be beneficial. Here, we prospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of rEPO in a single-center cohort of 47 patients with AIHA with inadequate reticulocytosis and endogenous erythropoietin at baseline. Epoetin alpha 40 000 international units per week were administered subcutaneously until hemoglobin (Hb) >11 g/dL and then tapered off. Overall response was 55% at 15 days, 74% at 1 month, 74% at 3 months, 80% at 6 months, and 91% at 12 months. Consistently, Hb values significantly increased from baseline to each subsequent time point (P<.001) with a median increase of +1.4, +2.4, +3.4, +3.8, and +4.4 g/dL, respectively. Transfusion needs reduced from 30% to <10% at 15 days and thereafter (P < .001). Concomitant medications included prednisone or methylprednisolone (N = 40, stable since >2 weeks from enrollment), mycophenolate mofetil (N = 1, ongoing since >3 months from enrollment), and rituximab (N = 7 patients with cold agglutinin disease from day 8). No association between concomitant medications and response to rEPO was found. Treatment was generally safe without rEPO-related severe adverse events. The comparison with an AIHA population not treated with rEPO showed a significant benefit of rEPO at 15 days and 1 month on response and Hb increase. These data support the use of rEPO as an add on to standard immunosuppression in AIHA with inadequate BM compensation. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05931718.

DQ molecules are the principal stimulators of de novo donor-specific antibodies in nonsensitized pediatric recipients receiving a first kidney transplant.

Data on the different HLA-antibody (Ab) categories in pediatric kidney recipients developing de novo donor-specific Abs (DSA) after transplantation are scarce. We retrospectively evaluated 82 consecutive nonsensitized pediatric recipients of a first kidney graft for de novo HLA Ab occurrence and antigen specificity. At a median follow-up of 6 years, 29% of patients developed de novo DSA, while 45% had de novo non-DSA. DSA appeared at 25-month median time post-transplant and were mostly directed toward HLA-DQ antigens. Considering each HLA antigen, the estimated rate of DQ DSA (7.55 per 100 person-years) was much higher than the rates observed for non-DQ DSA. The HLA-DQ Ab recognized determinants of the DQß chain in 70% of cases, α chain in 25% of cases, and both chains in one patient. Non-DSA peaked earlier than DSA, and were largely directed against HLA class I specificities that belonged to HLA-A- and HLA-B-related cross-reacting epitope groups (CREG) in 56% of cases. Our results indicate a need for evaluating HLA-DQ compatibilities in kidney allocation, in order to minimize post-transplant development of de novo DSA, known to be responsible for antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss.

Isoniazid in patient plasma may cause a false-positive result on the complement-dependent cytotoxicity test.

Correct definition of clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies is important for transplant organ allocation and outcome. We describe a candidate for kidney transplantation who was treated with isoniazid because of active tuberculosis. The patient's serum gave a positive antibody result on screening with the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test but a negative result on screening with a bead-based assay (Luminex). The clinical history indicated no immunologic stimuli. Subsequent testing on fresh serum samples confirmed the discrepancy between CDC and Luminex results. An autologous cross-match test gave negative results, and the antibodies were sensitive to dithiothreitol treatment. We postulated that nonspecific binding of drug-antibody complexes to panel lymphocytes in the CDC test may have caused the observed lympholysis. This case, although isolated, emphasizes the importance of the combined use of CDC and solid phase assays. The CDC results alone would have led to the erroneous conclusion that the patient was highly sensitized.

The impact of eNOS, MTR and MTHFR polymorphisms on renal graft survival in children and young adults.

BACKGROUND: The main cause of reduced long-term graft survival is chronic allograft injury. Cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperhomocysteinaemia, accumulation of asymmetric dimethylarginine, increased oxidative stress and decreased production of nitric oxide seem to play an important role. Functional polymorphisms of the endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) gene cause an alteration in nitric oxide production. Nitric oxide levels, and thus oxidative stress, are also influenced by hyperhomocysteinaemia. METHODS: We carried out a genetic analysis of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) 894G>T, methionine synthase (MTR) 2756A>G and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T/1298A>C in 268 renal allograft recipient/donor (D/R) matches, with respect to long-term graft survival. RESULTS: While MTHFR 677C>T/1298A>G and MTR 2756A>G polymorphism distribution in both recipients (R) and donors (D) showed no significant difference between matches with loss of graft function and those with long-term graft survival, the frequency of the eNOS 894TT genotype of donors was significantly increased (P = 0.040) in matches with better graft survival. The multivariate analysis identified the eNOS 894 genotype and clinically acute rejection episodes as independent risk factors for graft loss (P = 0.0406 and P = 0.0093, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The association between eNOS 894G>T polymorphism of donors and graft survival seems to suggest a role for this gene in chronic allograft injury; however, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.